The Spirit and Roots of Generosity and Miserliness

Our culture and socio-political environment call for us to be jolly and generous in the holiday season.  Piles of solicitations from myriad organizations serving the needs of homeless children and helpless animals, museums and arts’ organizations tug at our consciences and yank at our heart strings.

Many of us experience these requests as demands and may resent what they experience as an obligation and feign the spirit of generosity.

On the other hand, what a great pleasure to give out of a real sense of gratitude and appreciation!

We know there is no strict correlation between economics and generosity. Some people possess no more than the basics and find giving easy. While others with an abundance of material wealth struggle to give.

One explanation lies in a person’s connection to money beyond the obvious power to purchase things. Money and material possessions can be an attempt to replace the love and nurturance the individual didn’t receive in early childhood. But “stuff” doesn’t gratify in the way genuine connections (of caring) about other people do.  It is those caring relationships with other people (and animals and causes) that give our lives meaning and fill us with positive feelings of generosity.

The classic story of Scrooge in Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol reinforces the truth of this disparity. Scrooge is a wealthy but stingy business man who hates Christmas and abuses his employees, demanding long hours and paying a meager salary.

But one night the three ghosts of Christmas visit him in a nightmare to inform him that people will be glad to be rid of him and he will die a miserable death if he doesn’t change.

Dickens, a genius writer and natural psychologist, intuited the roots of stinginess. The character of Scrooge experienced emotional deprivation early in his life. His mother died and his father resented his son’s existence. Furthermore, Scrooge botched up past opportunities to reform. He had been engaged to a beautiful, loving woman, who left him when she realized he cared more about money than about her.

In brief, Scrooge’s nightmare transforms him from a miserable miser to a generous and happy person. He also benefits by gaining a sense of his power to lessen suffering in the world.

We can experience gratitude and relief that our contributions are not vital to each and every cause; there are others to pitch in. Reality dictates that we have to be prudent and selective in our giving in order to take care of ourselves.

For example, in an overwhelming spirit of generosity, Ms. W. almost gave away her savings. Had she done so, she would be unable to take care of herself and would  become a burden to others. In brief, indiscriminate generosity could turn into disaster.

To return to the pile of solicitations, they can be organized into the following categories to help us decide to whom to give:

1. I have to give to this person/organization/cause because it is politic for my career, public image, etc., to do so. 

2.  I really want to give to this person/organization/cause out of feelings of gratitude and/or kinship.

3.  I really don’t have to give to this individual/cause/organization and won’t.

We can keep in mind the goal to experience generosity as power, not depletion. Expressing authentic giving, melts resentment like ice around the heart and becomes a gift to ourselves.

Conclusion: Generosity is a state of mind that goes beyond the possession of money and material goods and relates to feelings of abundance from positive connections. To own an authentic sense of generosity is a gift we give ourselves.

 Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts.  jsimon145@gmail.com

Keeping Our Eyes on the Ball: When (and Where) Expectations meet Goals

The goal in baseball is clear: to score a home run. In real life,

keeping our goal in sight and mind may be more complex than tracking a baseball in the air. We can get distracted, waylaid, and discouraged before we’re able to swing a bat, hit the ball and score the run.

Mr. W. for example, felt isolated after the death of his wife. For years, he had dreamed about writing his life story.  Expecting to meet people to encourage him, he joined a writing group,  In the beginning, he found the group to be supportive. But when one member suggested he change the focus of his essay, he felt criticized and angrily withdrew from the circle. Instead of seeking out another venue to pursue his goal, he allowed anger and hopelessness to overcome him, acting as if he’d been defeated, tackled and knocked to the ground,

Although he blamed others, perceiving the obstacle to be outside himself,  he was responsible for keeping his eye on the ball, the goal of writing his story. Had he kept his aim in mind, he might have reconsidered his decision to withdraw from his writing group.

Often, life doesn’t conform to our expectations and instead throws us curves, conflicting messages that alternate between encouragement and discouragement.

Another example is found in the recent film “The Imitation Game,” the story of Alan Turing, the mathematician considered the father of the modern computer. An outlier who evokes criticism, misunderstanding and abuse from people throughout his life, from schoolmates to military officials, he persists in his objective to break the German code of “Enigma,” save lives, and put an end to WW II.

Another real life example is Ms. B. Employed at a clinic she received appreciation for years until the administration changed. Although her work performance remained beyond reproach, no one seemed to care. Instead of feeling disheartened and quitting, she reframed her expectations.  Her goal was not to be appreciated, but to do a good job and earn a salary.

Conclusion:  We do well to define our ambition in order to gain the clarity of a baseball player who keeps his eye on the ball and home plate as his goal.

Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts. jsimon145@gmail.com

The Observing Self: A Tool Essential to Save Ourselves and Our Planet

When I mention the term “observing self” or “observing ego” most people look at me with a quizzical expression as if such talk should stay in my office. But the “observing self” has broad application in and outside the psychotherapist’s terrain because it can create an awareness of self and a sense of place in the world.

The observing ego, or the split between our experience and our observation of it, allows us to perceive and change. By contrast, without the observing self, we experience ourselves as “acted upon,” or lacking control, and In the extreme, as a victim, similar to a caged animal.  In short, developing an “observing self” early on and with great effort helps to impart agency. “Agency is not automatic,” The New York Times journalist David Brooks writes. “It has to be given birth to with pushing and effort. It’s not just the confidence and drive to act. It’s having engraved inner criteria to guide action. The agency moment can happen at any age, or never.” (The New York Times, “The Agency Moment,” November 14, 2014).

Early in our evolution, we humans perceived that we were at the mercy of the Gods. We believed that powers operated on us. We lacked a sense of agency and probably didn’t believe we could overcome fate. The course of development has shown that we possess the potential to change, but doing so requires the observing self.

An aspect of psychological treatment is to nurture the delicate seedling of the observing self, this sometimes mysterious entity that some of us possess at an early age and that some don’t acquire in spite of extensive psychotherapy.

For example, Mr. O. suffered severe abuse as a child. During his years of psychotherapy, he was able to develop a keen observing self/ego that alleviated his paranoia, freeing him from his psychological cage to grant him a wide panorama of his world of relationships.

By contrast, Ms. Q. did not develop an observing self. An aspect of the observing self is the ability to see ourselves in all dimensions-—our positive as well as our negative attributes. Ms. Q. continued to insist that her son was “the bad one,” the source of the problem, and to view herself in a positive light. She paced back and forth, like a caged animal, unable to help herself or her offspring. 

Parents can play a critical part in fostering a sense of agency during a child’s development. Preventive pediatrics is now recognized as vital to a child’s health and to a nation’s financial well-being. Preventive psychiatry—education for each and every parent—would be a great evolutionary step. We have the psychological knowledge but lack the awareness and the legal structure to institute the discipline.

The ground-work (of knowledge) has been laid in the textbooks of child development, but the recognition and implementation of this knowledge may not happen for centuries. The same phenomenon—-of “agency” and observation applies to each one of us as well as to our entire species.

Conclusion: It is the observing self that grants us a sense of “agency” with the capacity to change ourselves and our world.

Dear Reader, Your comments are welcome. Jsimon145@gmail.com

Writing Our Way to Awareness

Descartes, the 15^th century philosopher and writer said, “I think, therefore I exist.” A person who jots down daily thoughts (whom I will refer to as a journal-keeper) might say, “I write: therefore I exist.” Writing down our experiences, thoughts, and dreams,  can function as a mirror that reflects and validates,  affirms and reinforces who we are.

Journal-writing can be used in a crisis to resolve a dilemma, or to acknowledge emotions that we can’t share with anyone. Furthermore, it is available any time of the day or night. We don’t have to find a friend’s willing ear or wait for the hour of a psychotherapy session.

 As a ten year old, I jotted notes on a little blue plastic-covered pad to express the feelings of love and hate toward my infant brother, with whom I had to share the attention of my overburdened mother. I couldn’t control my feelings, but scribbling them down gave me a sense of power and control over them.

Journal-keeping can be experienced as opening the shutters of a cloistered house to let in fresh country air.  Or to turn to the city for a metaphor: like widening an avenue to allow heavy traffic (our thoughts and feelings) to pass.

Journal-writing isn’t the only way to work through one’s thoughts. A few decades ago, I worked as a physician at Odyssey House, the therapeutic community for people addicted to drugs.  There I met Ruth Lisa Schechter. a skilled poetry therapist. Ruth led groups with the residents, inspiring them to write about their lives. Their peers provided an appreciative audience that helped to validate and the past trauma. Many felt empowered, often for the first time in their lives.

Several of my clients have found journal-keeping valuable, whether they jot down notes on a scrap of paper to present during a session, or record their daily progress in a new, elegant notebook, year after year.

Examining our own thoughts and feelings doesn’t necessarily lead to narcissistic self-involvement. Becoming aware of ourselves helps us become aware of others.

Conclusion: Writing can put us in the driver’s seat of our lives, to serve as a powerful tool to self-awareness and empowerment.

Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts. jsimon145@gmail.com

The Power of Perversity

When a bicyclist disobeys a red light and almost strikes me, or a driver fails to yield the right of way to me, a pedestrian crossing with a green light  and within the boundaries of the crosswalk, I call out, “Thank you.” For some perverse reason, my sarcasm--the opposite of what I really feel or want to say--offers relief. What I really want to say is  “You’re a jerk for nearly hitting me and adding to the chaos of our city.”

The sarcasm is a mechanism for covering up--hiding my own aggressive feelings. If I react with anger, that meets the wrongdoer’s expectations. He’d dismiss me, feel validated, and think,  

 “Look at all the power I have to frighten her and make her angry.”

On the other hand, a sarcastically delivered “thank you” may baffle and confuse him.

“What? She’s thanking me for disobeying the rules and almost striking her? That is strange.”

This unexpected response could add chaos in his mind and even cause him to examine his actions.

Wishful thinking on my part? No doubt. Nevertheless, it helps me cope with the aggravations of urban life.

Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts.

The Gift of an Appreciative Audience

Our parents or caretakers comprise our first audience, and it is through our relationship with them, that we derive a sense of identity and self esteem.

The “good-enough” parent or caretaker provides an encouraging mirror, an interactive audience, to accurately reflect and encourage the child’s development.

If a parent hasn’t acquired the skill during the process of his own development, he may not know how to execute this crucial task.

Psychoanalyst, Heinz Kohut (1913-1981), considered the father of self psychology, described the process and the importance of being “mirrored” by empathic and care-giving others. Kohut focused on narcissism, the antithesis of a healthy sense of self worth, deriving his theory from personal experience; he was reared by a possessive mother.

(Narcissism results from a lack of empathy and understanding in early life. Although the narcissistic person appears to think highly of himself,  he is actually  suppressing feelings of low self-esteem and a sense of worthlessness.)

Ms. W. ‘s experience exemplifies a person who wasn’t accurately “mirrored.” A learning disability was labeled laziness and as a result, she developed the self-protective defense of narcissism that caused difficulty in her relationships with other people.

Parents who have been raised in an emotionally-depriving environment may not be able to recognize or gratify their infant’s needs, and in extreme cases, expect the child to serve their own.

Mr. A. grew up in an abusive household, and had to take care of his mother during her alcoholic binges. As a result, he had little sense of independence or self esteem.

Like the parent/caretaker, the psychotherapist serves as an appreciative, encouraging  audience as well as a mirror to reflect reality. Linking past experiences to psychological blocks is like adding a catalyst to facilitate a process.

Ms. L., an only child, had been raised by an anxious mother. Distraught, she brought in her newborn and said, “I don’t know what to do with this baby.”  I suggested that she observe and describe what she saw:  The beautiful baby who lay peacefully cooing on my couch.  As she gazed at him, she relaxed and realized all she had to do was to be in the moment with him.  Relieved, she quickly learned to become an appreciative, encouraging audience.

To a greater or lesser extent, each of us needs an audience.

The world-famous violinist Joshua Bell experimented to see what would happen when, anonymously and unannounced, he played classical music in the subway station. Passersby didn’t notice him and he acknowledged he was distressed by the lack of an appreciative audience. He tried the experiment again, this time announcing the event beforehand. Throngs gathered and he was gratified by the cheering crowd.

(An earlier blog post (March 29, 2012) addresses the topic of

“The Absent Audience,” and the dire case of Sargent Bales, accused of killing Afghan civilians, who suffered severe stress that failed to be acknowledged.)

Denied sufficient positive audience, a disturbed person may turn to destructive acts to capture attention. An extreme case is exemplified by Mark Chapman, who in 1980, gunned down the Beatle John Lennon. Psychologists analyzed his history and concluded that he suffered from a narcissistic personality disorder. They based their diagnosis in part on the fact that Chapman craved the audience that his hero, Mr. Lennon, attracted.

Conclusions: We humans require an audience throughout our lives, The most essential and formative time occurs in our early years of development. Parents or primary caretakers fulfill this vital role and determine much about our identity and self esteem.

Teaching parenting skills to every parent and caretaker would advance human progress by light years.

A haiku summarizes the truism. 

From the beginning

the infant needs an audience

to know who he is

Dear Reader, I welcome your comments. Jsimon145@gmail.com

The Task of the Modern Psychotherapist

What would Freud say if he overheard me offering medical advice to a client for a toenail infection? He might be horrified because he’d want to probe for the deeper meaning of the topic. Imagining this

conversation with the great psychoanalyst inspired me to address some changes in the practice of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis since Freud’s time.

Of course like Freud, the psychotherapist aspires to the motto that  “Nothing human is alien to me.” Ideally, we’re not shocked by any confession, and we’re sworn to honor a client’s privacy, except in situations of potential suicide or homicide.

Freud believed that the mind is a blank slate or tabula rasa in Latin. The question then becomes to what extent does heredity, opposed to the environment, impact the tabula rasa of the developing brain. A simple answer today is that our perceptions of the mind change in accordance with discoveries in neuroscience.

For example, disorders like autism and attention deficit disorder, recognized and treated early in a person’s life, portend a more favorable prognosis. This observation connects and supports the hereditary nature of both conditions, and the environmental factors (involved in timing) of treatment. In other words, early intervention has a greater impact on the developing brain, and implies that windows of opportunity close rapidly.

Today psychotherapy is not restricted to an exploration of the unconscious, nor to the wealthy, elite, artistic, or intellectual.  The variety of psychotherapeutic techniques has broadened, and the psychotherapist hopes to meet the client’s challenges rather than adhering to a theory.

Freud’s outlook was decidedly more deterministic than today’s open-ended approach. Diagnosis doesn’t necessarily determine prognosis. We know we don’t have all the answers and expect the unexpected regarding possibilities and potential. Like the stock market, the outcome of psychotherapy is unpredictable: Past performance doesn’t predict or guarantee future results.

For example, a patient of mine, whom I refer to as Mr. Z., began psychotherapy following an affair. He questioned whether he should leave his wife. As therapy progressed, he was surprised to realize that he, himself, was the problem, not his spouse. He could barely tolerate his own company. He simply didn’t like himself. His outlook changed: Instead of focusing on what his life lacked, he began to appreciate his partner and home life.

For Freud, an objective of treatment was to convert neurotic suffering to the universal suffering of humankind. Today, the psychotherapist is more likely to focus on the positive aspects of life, like transformation and appreciation.

We live longer and recognize the capacity and human potential to change: We have the chance to engage in multiple careers, relationships, hobbies, interests, and travel. The psychotherapist supports change and maintains an open mind regarding the ability of a client to transform his life.  Our objective is to help the client become aware of how, when, and why he may get in the way of his goals (for example, fears of change, success, failure).

Regardless of a therapist’s orientation ­­­­––interactive, relational, psychodynamic, behavioral, cognitive––the “good-enough” psychotherapist conveys a belief in his client, and supports his efforts to improve his life and become the best, authentic person possible. (The term “good-enough” originates from the psychoanalyst, D.W. Winnicott, who applied the term to mothering).

Conclusion: The “good-enough” psychotherapist adapts theories to relate and collaborate with clients to support their growth and help examine obstacles that interfere with their constructive goals.

Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts. jsimon145@gmail.com

Money, Power, and Your Health

A recent AARP conference (ideas@50+ ) featured Arianna Huffington, president and editor-in-chief at The Huffington Post. In her presentation “Thriving After 50,” she spoke about retirement and the fact that people are not saving enough to “thrive” in their future. According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, about 36 percent of American workers have less tan $1,000 in retirement savings. Sixty percent have under $25,000 and 58 percent have debt problems.

There is little doubt that lack of sufficient money constitutes a major stress and contributes to bodily ills.  Our attitudes toward money undergird much of our lives,  impacting our lifestyle and sense of well-being. Yet many of us ignore the task of managing our finances, often with dire consequences.

Taking stock of your money with an eye on your financial future is a good idea. Here are some examples.

Do I think money:

1. is meant to spend on myself? Some of us feel deprived and believe material possessions will erase the suffering. For example, Mr. G. purchased multiples of shoes, sweaters, etc. filling his apartment with stuff he could never use.  Ultimately he had to declare bankruptcy.

2. can lift me out of the doldrums? Often a depressed person attempts to lift his mood by buying something new. Mr. B. realized the glitter of the new item quickly faded, and he wasn’t dealing with the real problem, but covering it over, like painting a rotting floor board.

3. is meant to spend on my children, because I’m generous,  want the best for them? Mr. V. wanted to save his children from accumulating  college debt and paid all their expenses. However, he neglected to save for himself and had to postpone retirement.

4.  is for others to handle?

Ms. W. knew in her “heart and mind” that she shouldn’t go into business with her husband.  But she did not listen to herself. When the business failed, she had to ask her son to help. He took over her finances, and she found herself in the humiliating situation of having to ask him for money.

5. requires too much discipline?

  At age 70, Ms. Q. still expected someone to bail her out as her mother did when she was a child. “Mom would open the cash register in her beauty salon whenever I asked for money.”

6. doesn’t have to be protected?

Mr. M. gave up his health insurance, betting on the odds that he wouldn’t get sick. When he became ill, his wife divorced him so she didn’t have to cover his medical bills.

7. is too frightening a matter to face?

  Mr. O. was often in a panic about his finances because he was too frightened to figure out how much he really needed to retire.

Once we recognize the psychological snafus, we can appreciate that 

the principles of money management are relatively simple.

1. Purchase what you really need.

2. Spend as little as possible to get the most.

 A woman doesn’t have to go beyond her budget to find attractive clothes. Similar styles are sold in Macy’s and Bergdorf’s.

3.Save as much as possible. No one can predict if or when an emergency will arise, and most of us want to have the option to retire.

4. Pay down debt as soon as possible.

Conclusion: Taking care of our money is an important aspect of taking care of ourselves--our health and sense of well-being. Investing time and effort in managing our money pays off in more ways than dollars.

P. S. Here is a haiku that is relevant to money management:

To finally know

the plum, use the whole heart too,

and your own nose.

  

   Onitsura (1660-1738)

It inspired me to write my own:

To counterbalance

the gross substance of lucre

seek the plump rose

 Dear Reader, I welcome your responses. Jsimon145@gmail.com

Permission & Prohibition

As humans we are dependent on obtaining permission from someone, sometimes for almost anything we do!

Permission applies to behaviors whether they relate to our bodies, our minds, our feelings or our socio-cultural behaviors.

Let’s begin with our bodies. The baby naturally puts his fingers and toes in his mouth. Understandably, he eventually learns not to.  Sucking one’s thumb is certainly not permissible after a certain age. We all learn that many bodily functions belong out of public view.

But lack of permission regarding our body can be detrimental. In his fifth decade, Mr. K. thought he was becoming deaf.  The doctor found mounds of wax were occluding his auditory canal. When his ears were cleaned, he heard very well.  He realized he had never cleaned them because his mother told him not to put anything in his ears.

Most of us learn that our feet are dirty and require no attention beyond washing. But Ms. W. suffered from foot pain and the podiatrist gave her exercises that decreased inflammation and prevented contractures of the toes. We’ve learned to diminish and regard feet as “inferior,” but they are most essential in supporting and balancing our entire skeleton and aligning our bodies.

When we fail to have permission and go against our parents, we may suffer dire consequences. On my recent vacation to Hallstatt, Austria, I learned about Saint Barbara, patron saint to the miners since the seventh century. On the mountainside many visit her prominent shrine. Barbara, a beautiful 29-year-old woman, was beheaded by her father for converting to Christianity! (Fortunately, disobeying a parent doesn’t often lead to this extreme!)

Undoubtedly, we grow up without permission to accept our feelings. We often hear a parent say to a child, “Don’t be sad. Don’t cry.” Rarely does time or opportunity allow an exploration of why the young person should or shouldn’t be sad.

In psychotherapy the client gains permission to experience all feelings and thoughts, to understand them and to figure out what to do with them. Obviously not all thoughts and feelings are appropriate to express or act upon.

A big lesson in life is having permission to make mistakes. Years of schooling teaches us that mistakes lower our grades. But in the real world, we learn a lot from making mistakes. A classic example is the experience of Dr. Alexander Fleming, who discovered the earth-altering antibiotic penicillin, when his Petri dish became accidentally contaminated by a mold.

Regarding permission and socio-cultural practices, examples are almost endless.  Mr. R. grew up in a country where the fish head was considered the most tasty part of the anatomy. In the U.S. he met people who wouldn’t eat this food unless it was thoroughly cleaned.

Conclusion: Re-examining our behaviors regarding permission and prohibitions in the realm of body, mind (belief systems), feelings and socio-cultural practices can be beneficial to our health and well-being.

Dear Reader, I welcome your comments. Jsimon145@gmail.com.

Attachments & Connections to Ourselves & Our World

The nature of the early attachment to our parents or primary caretakers influences (to a major degree) our relationships for the rest of our lives.

John Bowlby (1907-1990), the first attachment theorist, concluded that these early emotional bonds affect us from “the cradle to the grave.” He observed that the cries of an infant when separated from a parent or caretaker is an adaptive response to assure his survival.  The child feels loved when a parent (or caretaker) is accessible, attentive and reliable, and this in turn, leads to feelings of security and confidence that allow him to explore his environment. Failure to receive good-enough physical or emotional nurturing leads to (feelings of) anxiety, or in more extreme cases, despair and depression.

As we mature, we form bonds outside the family. Ideally the circle of connections increases to include teachers, peers, girl or boy scout troops and/or fellow team mates.

The adage, “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” is a useful metaphor to keep in mind. Often, people with affiliations (beyond attachments to fellow humans) to include a discipline, like arts or sciences, fare better than those who rely exclusively on interpersonal relationships. Outside interests render us less vulnerable to our less-than-perfect fellow humans who at times fall short of our expectations.

Mr. D. failed to receive good-enough nurturing early in life and never felt loved or accepted by his wife or children. When his dog died, he experienced a severe depression and had to be hospitalized.

By contrast, Ms. W. was able to transform her feelings of abuse (at work) to an interest in studying law. Desire to learn the legal aspects of work place behavior connected her to the library and to other people in similar situations.

Jonathan Lear’s classic 1990 book Love and its Place in Nature, a philosophical interpretation of Freudian analysis, expands Freud’s libido theory to positive connections beyond intimate relationships. Love, a basic force in nature, underlies the (infinite possible) positive affiliations to our world.

 

Our connections to the world are in a state of flux throughout our lifetime. We attach and detach to people, places and things as we evolve.

Mr. I. married twice and lost his wives to illness. In middle age, he decided he preferred a variety of friends to forming another marital bond.

Flexibility of our attachments and connections leads to physical and emotional health. By contrast, rigidity leaves us vulnerable.

When forced to retire early, Mr. F. became very depressed.  He hadn’t realized the extent to which he had relied on his job to fill his life.

Today many of us bond with technology. Witness the ubiquitous presence of the laptop and iPad. How this reliance alters the nature of our relationships to each other and our world is complex, and at present, to a large degree, unanswered.

Conclusion: Attachments and connections change throughout our lives. The quality of flexibility helps us adjust to our evolving selves and the world.

Dear Reader, I look forward to your response. jsimon145@gmail.com.

Please check for the next post on September 1. 

Conundrums of Our Complex Minds and World

Our human minds often complicate simple matters and  simplify complex ones.  Take the example of the stock market. It goes up until it goes down. But when it is rising, most of us (naïve) investors assume the trend will continue; when it is sinking (especially at a rapid pace) most of us don’t believe or trust that it will ever rise again. “The investing masses expect the most when prospects are worst, and vice versa,” William Baldwin said in the June issue of Forbes Magazine,

For socioeconomic, religious and psychological reasons, we may complicate a clear matter like nutrition. (Please refer to my blog post of May 12, Maintenance and the Body Self).   Simply stated, we consume calories (to provide energy) in the form of a balanced diet of proteins, carbohydrates and fats. We often overlook the simple equation that too many calories equals a gain in weight.

 

Happiness and sadness, gains and losses alternate like day and night, yet the human mind frequently becomes stuck in one position, like a car locked in gear. Quite often, we need to experience a few cycles before we perceive, and hopefully, accept them.

On the other hand, our minds simplify complex matters. We tend to turn a conflict into a matter of black and white (like the situation in the Middle East). Often the truth lies somewhere in the middle, with a broad swatch of gray in which both sides bear responsibility to resolve the conflict.

A developed mind is required to perceive and sort out the complexity of our human condition. In her work with children, the psychoanalyst Melanie Klein observed the psychological defense mechanism  she coined “splitting” to explain the phenomenon of black-and-white thinking.

Raised in a supportive and nurturing environment, the child’s mind develops the capacity to juxtapose opposing points of view and to perceive the complexity or gray zone of a person and/or situation. (Maurice Sendak’s classic 1963 children’s story, Where the Wild Things Are, is a delightful portrayal of how this process is played out. In the story, little Max misbehaves. He’s sent to his room where he fantasizes about a kingdom with wild beasts. Psychologically speaking, these creatures represent the (unconscious) projection of his rage.  He tames the wild animals, and this feat enables him to integrate opposing views of the world in which his parents nurture and reward him, as well as reprimand him.

This discussion relates to psychotherapy in significant ways. The “good-enough” therapist attempts to dislodge the client from the world perceived as all black or all white-to help the client integrate diverse points of view and the complexity of relationships.

Because an individual has spent years perceiving the world in binary terms, the process is neither quick nor simple.  Years may be required to accomplish the paradigmatic shift in a world view.

Oddly enough, the ability to integrate diverse points of view isn’t related to intelligence or educational level. Mr. O, very intelligent man who graduated Phi Beta Kappa from college, wasn’t able to grasp this concept and, as a result, his personal relationships suffered.  Presumably, his traumatic early environment created the need to maintain the rigid defense mechanism of splitting.

Nor does psychotherapy guarantee the ability to integrate the polarities. More important is an individual’s recognition that the process is possible and productive.

Meditation (time alone with our thoughts) and a desire to understand and resolve conflict help us live in our complex world.

Conclusion: A conundrum of the human condition is our tendency to simplify complex issues and complicate simple issues. Recognizing that tendency helps resolve the polarities in ourselves and our world.

Dear Reader, I welcome your response. Jsimon145@gmail.com.

In Pursuit of Persistence

Nature is persistent I think as I observe the plantlets pushing their fragile stems and leaves between stones and bricks embedded in the ground surrounding a New York City tree.

Persistence is the pursuit of a goal in spite of obstacles and is a key element to success.  But if persistence is so important, why doesn’t it come more naturally?-- like breathing for example.

Observe the infant:  He instinctively struggles to sit up and walk and talk.  But beyond early life, many of us loose our natural forward thrust or have trouble maintaining it.

Curiosity and motivation help us persist, but to this day these attributes-- how to nurture and who possesses them—for the most part, remain mostly mysterious.

What factors influence our drive to persist?  Perhaps instead of encouragement along the way, we’re exposed to criticism that inhibits our progress. By contrast, an appreciative audience can spur us on like a favorable tail wind.

For example, Ms. S. was raised by a critical mother and a praising father. The contradictory messages led to confusion and doubt and interfered with her goal to become a singer. Before she persisted, she had to become aware of her thoughts and conflicted self-perception that blocked her progress.

Obstacles include fears of many kinds. For example, fear of failure as well as of success. Either case portends change which humans in general shun.

Staying with negative, uncomfortable emotions—whatever these may be-- from doubt to fear of isolation- plays a role in persistence. Leonard Bernstein, one of the great orchestra conductors of the 20^th century and a composer of celebrated musicals like West Side Story, struggled with his fear of isolation. Spending time alone, a necessity in the creative process, was agony for him. He struggled with the question of whether he should devote his energy to composing or to conducting. In a letter to a college roommate, he wrote, “You may remember my chief weakness-my love for people. I need them all the time—every moment....I cannot spend one day alone without becoming ...depressed” (The Leonard Bernstein Letters edited by Nigel Simeone). Composing was so “lonely” for him, and yet he occasionally sacrificed companionship and persisted  in his craft, and in doing so, left a lasting imprint on the American psyche.

 

Conclusion: Persistence includes enduring discomfort and facing our negative feelings.

Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts. jsimon145@gmail.com.