Monday, May 30, 2016

Intimacy, a Hierarchy (with Thanks to Abraham Maslow)



The word “intimacy” has a broad range of meanings, referring to familiarity with a person, place, thing, or even a time in history.
 
In this blog, I’ll focus on intimacy in our personal relationships.
Found in many varieties, Intimacy is a vital ingredient in parent-child relationships, to friendship, to the sexual and psychological intimacy of life-time mates. (Although many of us probably think first of sexual intimacy, my dictionary lists it in sixth place.)

A common misconception is the belief that we have to know someone well to regard the relationship as intimate.   Otto Frank, Ann Frank’s father who discovered her diaries and had them published, realized how little he knew about his daughter. Here are his words,  “I must say, I was very much surprised by the deep thoughts Anne had. It was quite a different Anne I had known as my daughter...And my conclusion is, since I had been in very good terms with Anne, that most parents don’t know really their children.”

The antithesis of intimacy is the need to control the other. Often this barrier to intimacy stems from fear and can be explored—in therapy or in other ways— with positive results. 

Crises of intimacy offer fertile land for growth. This occurred in the K. family. When Ms. K returned to college, her husband objected; she was no longer available to cook dinner and care for their son after school. She encouraged her husband, who worked at home, to adjust. A year later, he realized that he’d benefitted. He’d learned to cook and liked it, and he deepened the bond with his son.

On my visit to Japan about ten years ago, I heard about the cultural  marital crisis. Husbands were retiring and expecting their wives to cater to them all day long. But the wives, accustomed to having their days free, objected. If they wanted to stay happily married, the husbands had to learn to take their wives’ needs into account. As a result, the relationships became more intimate.

We’re complex beings, and there is always more to learn. Caring is more important than “knowing.”  Are we interested, receptive, curious? The element of surprise can fuel a sense of newness and add excitement when we’re open to it.

Degrees of intimacy can be superimposed on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.  On the basic level, we gratify creature comforts—the physiological needs for food, water, warmth and rest. Next comes the need for safety and security.  Farther up the ladder is our psychological need to belong and have friends and relationships and above that, are feelings  of esteem, prestige and accomplishment. The top rung brings self-fulfillment and self-actualization with the achievement of our full potential, the ability to create in a given field of endeavor.

In my blog of December 14, 2015 (Gratitude for Our Times (& a Peek into the Life & Times of Rose Kennedy), I compared Rose and Joseph Kennedy with the power couples of today. Rose lived in a patriarchal society and her husband, Joseph, dominated the family. Today’s power couples, like the Gateses and the Zuckerbergs, have an equal, collaborative partnership as they work on their creative and philanthropic endeavors.

Conclusion:  We have progressed to expect caring, cooperation, and collaboration in our intimate relationships.


Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts. jsimon145@gmail.com

Monday, May 16, 2016

Should We Just Get Over It?


How many times do we hear from a friend or acquaintance, the irritating advice, “Oh, just get over it.”

The list of  “it’s” can range from a loss of a loved one to divorce to financial troubles to a trivial event like a bad haircut. In general, the advice-giver has heard your story several times and is frustrated at his/her own inability to “do something,” as well as your inability to move on from the traumatic event.

If it’s a serious matter, we may dwell on it for a while, continuing to mull it over and view it from a variety of angles. Mourning the loss of a loved one can last as long as a lifetime. A person with post-traumatic stress disorder may revisit and relive a trauma in repeated nightmares and flashbacks that can last for months or years.

Some people hold on to an “it” as a life-defining experience. For example, Ms. W’s mother died in childbirth, and shortly thereafter, the father blamed and abandoned her. One does not ‘get over’ these transformative tragedies. Nevertheless, repeating the story at every social gathering can repulse or drive away people, leaving the unfortunate one feeling alone and desolate.

Sometimes well-meaning sympathizers won’t let us forget the unfortunate event, even though we’re ready to move on. A woman whom I met in India had lost her son in a highway accident. Paradoxically, it was her friends who repeated the events of the tragedy and couldn’t allow her to get over her loss. As a result, she had to distance herself from them and found a gratifying project—opening her home to tourists for whom she could prepare her gourmet dinners.

That said, most of us could use people around us who can reflect and provide words of advice, pinning down a theme, or pointing out a tendency to repeat and isolate.

To return to a trivial event: I obsessed about a bad haircut for a few days to various people who were most helpful. “I have a stylist to recommend,” someone said; another suggested,   “Go talk to  your hairdresser.” This kind of concrete suggestion served us all. I received sympathy and my audience felt useful.

The ‘it’ only becomes problematic when the individual is unable to re-engage in a productive, rewarding life – joining activities and socializing.

In summary, an awareness of the impact on others, with an eye toward the kind of response we’d like, can help us decide to “get over it.”

Only the individual can decide to “just get over it” or take it to another dimension such as one of these options:

1.     Move the episode from center to off-stage in your relationships.
2.     Join a group that focuses on the theme.
3.     Keep a journal.
4.     Find a role model who has negotiated a similar event.
5.     Recognize the need for psychotherapy or counseling.

Conclusion:  What matters is that the individual himself accept the time and energy needed to metabolize and integrate the psychic change in order to continue with life in the present.

Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts and experiences. jsimon145@gmail.com


Monday, May 2, 2016

Unraveling and How to Prevent It


The word ‘unravel’ means a kind of taking apart. In a psychological sense, the feeling is horrifying, discombobulating, analogous to a ship lost at sea in a storm, with a broken-down engine, a shattered rudder,  a mal-functioning compass with no sign of rescue in sight.

In literature, Don Quixote by Miguel Cervantes (Shakespeare’s contemporary with whom he celebrated a four-hundredth anniversary this April) embodies the classic example of a man who verges on the border of sanity and insanity as he battles windmills. He’s fortunate to have a helpmate, Sancho Panza, who tries to stabilize him.

In the nonfiction world, the psychological state of unraveling can happen to any of us, given the nature and degree of stress lying beyond our personal endurance .We can  be influenced by external forces or changes in the environment: relocation, loss of a loved one, financial problems, job loss, as well as intrinsic factors like physiology, biochemistry and illnesses.

We’re vulnerable to this horrific state throughout our lifetime but the impact of stresses changes. For example, losing a parent uproots a child to a greater extent than an adult.

The relative invisibility of the state increases the treachery. Unless a person has experienced it, the condition is frequently misunderstood. For this reason, the sufferer feels alone, isolated, crazy, often wishing he could trade his psychological discomfort for a physical malady to receive sympathy.

Stresses that unmoor a given individual can seem to  like a positive event to others—like a job promotion. But some are burdened by added responsibilities. For example, Ms. K, a teacher, was promoted from teaching a class to heading a department.  Overwhelmed by the burden, she asked to return to her original job.

A personal vignette embodies an example of changing course to stay afloat. I lived with my father during the first year of medical school. At the end of the year, Dad declared that the arrangement wasn’t working, and said I’d have to leave his home. Shocked by the news, I reviewed my options: should I dash home to the comfort of my mother’s house? That choice would mean withdrawing from medical school and abandoning my goal. So I nixed that possibility; instead, I found a tiny room in the YWCA nearer the school than Dad’s house. In brief, I shifted my focus from family relations to my studies, and sidestepped the danger of unraveling.

The questions to ask is: What uproots and what anchors us? Discovering the answer and following the steps that connect and stabilize us, may prevent the treacherous state.

Here are a few suggestions:
Meditation
Positive beliefs
Faith/religion
Nurturing relationships with friends, family, pets
Interests and or Projects: writing, reading, sports etc.
Home and Homeland

Conclusion: Identifying the factors that stabilize us can prevent the torment of unraveling.


Dear Reader, I welcome your thoughts and experiences. jsimon145@ gmail.com

Printfriendly