High profile,
gruesome incidents- like the crash into the French Alps of the Germanwings jet on March 24, 2015 that killed 149 helpless people-naturally invite questions about the mental state of the perpetrator,
Andreas Lubitz. In addition, the event may increase fear of people who suffer
from mental disorders. My concern is that these incidents offer the opportunity
to stigmatize and/or scapegoat those who acknowledge and seek help for
psychological conflicts.
Dr. James L.
Knoll, the director of Forensic Psychiatry at the State University of New York
Upstate Medical University, echoes my concern. “People want an easily graspable
handle to help understand this, to blame something or scapegoat,” Dr. Knoll
said Erica Goode, The New York Times, April 6, 2015).
In an earlier blog related to gun control (2013), I quoted the forensic psychiatrist Michael Stone who said, “Most mass murders are done by working class men we’ve been jilted, fired, or otherwise humiliated, and who undergo a crisis of rage.”(The New York Times on January 16, 2013).
We aren’t privy
to the content of co-pilot Andreas Lubitz’s sessions with his psychiatrist
beyond the fact that he revealed suicidal tendencies. Had Lubitz openly spoken
about his intentions, it is possible that the catastrophe could have been
averted.
I had one instance in more than 30-plus years as a psychiatrist, in which a patient revealed
his intention to commit mass murder. The patient, who I refer to as Mr. C.,
held intense grievances toward his employer. He was grateful that I was willing
to testify in court for him advising his retirement from the workforce.
As a result of my testimony, he received workers’ compensation, and for the next twenty years of psychotherapy, he continued to rail against the company.
As a result of my testimony, he received workers’ compensation, and for the next twenty years of psychotherapy, he continued to rail against the company.
Although we don’t
know for sure if Mr. C. would have acted on his threats, in these instances I
certainly think erring on the side of caution is preferable to taking chances.
CONCLUSION: To
scapegoat and stigmatize people with psychological problems may discourage them
from seeking treatment and result in a backlash including the occurrence of an
increased incidence of violent episodes.
As a nation, we
benefit from increasing access to psychological/psychiatric care, as well as
propagating the principles of good-enough parenting, which can help:
1. develop a healthy sense of self-esteem
2. gain respect for human life
3. acquire ways to deal with disappointment,
frustration, loss and other grievances that obviate the desire to act destructively.
Dear Reader, I
welcome your opinions. Jsimon145@gmail.com
You can also follow me on twitter:@js145 or comment anonymously below.
You can also follow me on twitter:@js145 or comment anonymously below.