By adding the dimension of attention, the simple act of hearing can be elevated to listening, a skill that, according to the auditory neuroscientist Seth Horowitz, could be in decline. He outlines different types of listening: from the automatic, relatively simple, defensive, life-preserving response of a startle reaction to subtle interpretations involving our higher cortical neurons (The New York Times, November11, 2012, p. 10). Dr. Horowitz is concerned that, “in a world of digital distraction and information overload,” we are in danger of losing our ability to listen.
Psychotherapists must
learn to listen in a most profound sense, to know when and how to listen
without speaking.
This is not easy, because
we have been conditioned to respond by speaking. Paradoxically, silence can be
a gift greater than words, indicating deeper attention and understanding.
For example, a daughter
shares her troubles with her mother. She doesn't want to be told what to do.
She may simply want her mother to listen as a receptive audience. The nod of a mother's head
suffices to show she is present and caring.
A correct and well-timed
interpretation during an analytic treatment gives a sense of being physically
held. Silence is a variation on this theme. To remain silent at poignant
moments is a kind of containing, analogous to what pioneering psychoanalyst D.W.
Winnicott called a “holding environment,” as a mother embraces and comforts her
infant.
Similarly, our love for
pets like dogs and horses may be explained by their silence: We feel listened
to, understood and contained.
Conclusion: With the
focus on modern technology and rapid communication, the art of listening is threatened and deserves our attention.
Sorting out the differences between hearing and listening, and recognizing the varieties of listening, can enhance our personhood and deepen our relationships.
Dear Reader, I welcome your comments. jsimon145@gmail.com
Dear Reader, I welcome your comments. jsimon145@gmail.com