But preference
is not the same as an insatiable compulsion. I like to think I could learn to
accept fewer choices if I had to (although the propensity to fool ourselves is part
of human nature). But an insatiable person suffers. The hoarder, for example,
is burdened by too much stuff that
takes up space, limits freedom to move, and threatens personal relationships.
Compared to the
insatiability of greed, the principles of Stoicism set a stage more conducive
to happiness. Stoicism, a systematic philosophy, dating from around 300 B.C., states
that to live the good life, we must live in accord with our human nature, as
rational, reflective, and thoughtful beings, and conform our actions to the conditions
of the natural world. The stoic Epictetus said,“There is only one place the
world can’t touch: our inner selves, our choice at every moment to be brave, to
be reasonable, to be good…. Where is the good? In the will…If anyone is
unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone.”
We envy wealth
because we associate it with happiness. But this could be an illusion. Psychology
recognizes underlying factors that lead an “average” person to become
insatiable. He’s disconnected from his “real” or “true” self, the spontaneous,
problem- solving, creative aspect of psyche described by psychiatrists Donald Winnicott
and Karen Horney in the twentieth century. The false, insatiable self isn’t grounded in reality because
a person has received less than “good enough” parenting.
Charles Dickens,
the author of the classic story The Christmas Carol, was not only a genius
writer but also a natural psychologist. He intuited the dynamics underlying
greed before the time of Winnicott and Horney. The character Scrooge learns the
origin of his greed when he is visited in a nightmare by the Ghost of Christmas
Past, who reveals that Scrooge was abandoned as a child on Christmas by his
father. So began his lack of socialization and empathy. Scrooge’s insatiable
hunger stems from the absence of caring family bonds.
Most politicians
have been raised with the sense that they are “special” and privileged. They
need to have an inflated sense of themselves and their purpose to hold a
demanding and powerful position. Ideally they serve the people of their nation.
World history reveals that too often, however, they serve their own drives for
power and wealth.
In his October 4
New York Times editorial titled, “Why Let the Rich Hoard all the Toys? Nicolas
D. Kristof writes that economic problems stem from the fact that most of the
nation’s wealth is held in the hands of very few. He quotes Joseph Stiglitz the
Nobel laureate who says that economic inequality is leading to “an economic system that is less stable,
less efficient, with less growth.”
Conclusion: We look
unfavorably upon those who acquire their wealth illegally, rip off, harm or
exploit others in a ruthless manner, hoard or condescend to those less
fortunate. But wealth itself isn’t abhorrent. Rather, it’s the ungracious,
greedy attitude of some wealthy people that we find distastful.
Dear Readers,
Please add your comments. Jsimon145@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment